ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction: Detection of anxiety and depression in the recipient-donor pair (BinRD) during the kidney transplant protocol (KT) is important to establish psychoeducational interventions that help achieve success during and after KT. Objective: To determine the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms in the BinRD during the RT protocol and to identify characteristics and associated factors. Methods: Cross-sectional study, including 174 binomials being evaluated for TR. The Beck Depression Scale (BDI-II) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were applied at the beginning of the RT protocol. Results: Anxiety and depression symptoms were more frequent in recipient candidates than in donors ([anxiety 39% vs 21%] [depression 46% vs 15%]) (p<0.0001). The recipients presented a higher risk of depression (OR=4.770, 95% CI 2.854-7.974, p<0.0001) and anxiety (OR=2.383, 95% CI 1.478-3.841, p<0.001). Undertaking hemodialysis in private units (OR 0.264, 95%CI 0.106-0.662, p=0.004) or being on automated peritoneal dialysis (OR 0.386, 95%CI 0.173-0.862, p=0.020 was associated with less anxiety in recipients. Conclusions: a high frequency of anxiety and depression symptoms in the BinRD, so it is important to offer effective psychological interventions focused especially on the recipient during the donation evaluation process.
RESUMEN Introducción: La detección de ansiedad y depresión en el binomio receptor-donador (BinRD) durante el protocolo de trasplante renal (TR) es importante, para establecer intervenciones psicoeducativas que ayuden a lograr el éxito durante y después del TR. Objetivo: Determinar presencia de síntomas de ansiedad y depresión en el BinRD durante el protocolo de TR e identificar características y factores asociados. Métodos: Estudio transversal, incluye 174 binomios en evaluación para TR. Se aplicó la Escala de Depresión de Beck (BDI-II) y la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HADS) al inicio del protocolo de TR. Resultados: Síntomas de ansiedad y depresión fueron más frecuentes en candidatos a receptores que en donadores ([ansiedad 39% vs 21%] [depresión 46% vs 15%]) (p<0.0001). Los receptores, presentaron mayor riesgo de depresión (OR=4.770, IC 95% 2.854-7.974, p<0.0001) y ansiedad (OR=2.383, IC 95% 1.478-3.841, p<0.001). Realizarse hemodiálisis en unidades privadas (OR 0.264, IC95% 0.106-0.662, p=0.004) o estar en diálisis peritoneal automatizada (OR 0.386, IC95% 0.173-0.862, p=0.020 se asoció a menor ansiedad en receptores. Conclusiones: Se evidenció una alta frecuencia de síntomas de ansiedad y depresión en el BinRD, por lo que es importante ofrecer intervenciones psicológicas eficaces enfocadas especialmente al receptor durante el proceso de evaluación para la donación.
ABSTRACT
Background: The impact of donor quality on post-kidney transplant survival may vary by candidate condition. Objective: Analyzing the combined use of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and the estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) scale and their correlation with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in deceased-donor kidney recipients (DDKR). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. We included DDKRs between 2015 and 2017 at a national third-level hospital. Results: We analyzed 68 DDKR. The mean age at transplant was 41 ± 14 years, 47 (69%) had sensitization events, 18 (26%) had delayed graft function, and 16 (23%) acute rejection. The graft survival at 12 and 36 months was 98.1% (95% CI 94-100) and 83.7% (95% CI 65-100), respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the percentage reduction in the annual eGFR and the sum of EPTS and KDPI scales was r = 0.61, p < 0.001. The correlation coefficient between the percentage reduction in the annual eGFR and the EPTS and KDPI scales separately was r = 0.55, p < 0.001, and r = 0.53, p < 0.001, respectively. Conclusions: The sum of EPTS and KDPI scales can provide a better donor-recipient relationship and has a moderately positive correlation with the decrease in eGFR in DDKR.